I'm a Dedicated Free-Market Advocate, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Top Solution for American Health System

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare it to what average American pays. I can name multiple clients who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like much of our government's defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.

Lisa Jones
Lisa Jones

A seasoned sports analyst with over a decade of experience in betting markets, specializing in statistical modeling and risk management.